Intro.
It had been a long while since I had been able to enjoy a nice relaxing evening with take out food and a bunch of great films. I had plenty on my DVR, so I scrolled through to find one suited for my mood. I stumbled upon this one, The Locket. I'm not normally one for melodramas, but as this one starred Laraine Day and Robert Mitchum and added in a psychological twist, I thought it might be good. As far as story-telling went, it was well worth watching. Overview
Basically, this is a story within a story within a story within a story. The depths of the film are peeled away like onion skins. First we meet John Willis (Gene Raymond) and his beautiful fiancee Nancy (Laraine Day) at their engagement party. They seem to be the perfect, happy couple. But a stranger arrives and asks to see John in private. The stranger turns out to be Nancy's ex-husband, Dr. Harry Blair (Brian Aherne). Blair warns John he's making a huge mistake - that Nancy has already ruined the lives of three men. His story launches a flashback to when he had met Nancy and their lives together. However, this flashback gets interrupted when Blair explains that he too had been warned about Nancy - about how she alone was responsible for a man being wrongly executed in Sing-Sing. The man to warn him was named Norman Clyde (Robert Mitchum). Norman's story launches another flashback about how he had met Nancy. Apparently Nancy and Norman had been at an art dealer's party (Norman was a painter) and Nancy had stolen a diamond bracelet left by some guest in the bathroom. She told Norman it was all just her gut reaction - she just wanted it and took it. Her teary-eyed explanation takes us to the last flashback, which takes place when she was about ten years old and living with her mother, a housekeeper to an extremely rich family. Nancy was falsely accused of stealing the family's daughter's diamond locket and severely punished for it. It's more of an emotional beating that leaves grown up Nancy still shaking in Robert's arms as she tells him about it. He convinces her to mail back the bracelet anonymously. We think all is resolved until they go to another party and the host is murdered, his prize diamond stolen. Did Nancy do it? We don't really know. But she lies to the police and lets the butler take the fall for the crime (that's 2 of the 3 men whose lives she ruined, if you're keeping score). Norman desperately tries to save the butler, hence his visit to Blair, but it doesn't do any good. I won't go on from there except to say that Blair also comes to learn the disturbing truth about Nancy while living with her in England. Even as a psychiatrist, he cannot help her, and their subsequent divorce leads to her returning and finding John. It all ends back where it started - with the wedding preparations for Nancy and John. But Nancy gets the shock of her life when she meets with her mother-in-law, and the film comes to a close. (No spoilers here!)
Highlights
I really enjoyed all of the layers to this film. It was a lot of fun to keep peeling back layer after layer, just as you would to get at the heart of any person's personality. It had a film noir quality to it as it not only had the multiple flashbacks, but also the overall dark tone. I realize now as I write this, that there is very little evidence that Nancy killed her host and stole his diamond - the entire case is really built on suspicion and the way Norman reacts to her story. That part is really well done and intriguing. Laraine Day is also wickedly delightful as this angel-faced, allegedly-homicidal kleptomaniac. All the men who surround her are helpless, and only one - Blair - manages to escape in one piece.Apart from its noir-ish elements, the film really is a melodrama and its attempts at the "psychological drama" aren't done well. I feel bad to admit this, but the secret at the heart of Nancy's problems didn't really seem all that devastating to me. The only justification I could see was that perhaps she already had some psychological problems and the incident with the locket was just the trigger she needed. I almost wish we had some more time with her as she grew up - did the incident that cost her mother's job ruin their family? Did her mother find work again? Did she blame Nancy constantly for her unhappiness? It's a bit of a jump and leaves a lot of questions unanswered. I don't want to sound cold - anyone would've been severely shaken by that business with the locket, but very few people I know would have turned to theft and purgery and possibly murder. The ending seemed much too easy, too simple, though the irony of it has a bit of a redeeming quality. I won't dwell on it more, just in case you decide to watch!
Review
If you can get past the flaws with motive and psychology, you will find some things to appreciate in The Locket. For the most part, the story-telling is wonderful. I really enjoyed all the depths and twists each story took as we went further back into Nancy's past. The film itself even feels like a case study - as if we are in Dr. Blair's shoes evaluating a patient. So overall, not one of the best films I've reviewed, but still enjoyable and a good example of plot techniques.