The Barefoot Contessa (1954)

Humphrey Bogart makes the best fairy godfather ever.

Intro.

1954 was the year of fairy tales, at least for Humphrey Bogart's filmography.  First he had a huge success with The Caine Mutiny, for which he was nominated for an Academy Award.  Then he made Sabrina, which is in itself a fairy tale about a little girl turning into a fine lady and falling in love.  And then came The Barefoot Contessa, an interesting Hollywood take on the Cinderella story.  The Barefoot Contessa is the third in the trio of classic films often referenced as the best ones made about the industry (the others being The Bad and the Beautiful and Sunset Boulevard).

Overview 

The Barefoot Contessa opens with a funeral for the title character, led by a voiceover from Harry Dawes (Humphrey Bogart), a writer-director who knew the whole story.   He tells us of the Contessa from the beginning, back when she was just a poor nightclub dancer in Spain named Maria Vargas (Ava Gardner).  Millionaire producer Kirk Edwards (Warren Stevens), his PR guy Oscar Muldoon (Edmond O'Brien) and Harry.  Maria is anything but impressed by them and when she leaves the club without warning, Harry is ordered to find her or lose his job.  He does and she comes to realize that he's not like the others - he's honest.  He sees her unstable family and her desire to leave Spain and she in turn tells him about being a poverty stricken child hiding shoeless in the dirt during the Civil War.  She has a world weariness attached to this pure hope of something beautiful, like a fairy tale coming true.  She taps into that duality and becomes a smash hit in Hollywood, where Harry directs her in three films.  Her career hits a curve ball though when her father is arrested back in Spain for the murder of her mother.  Instead of laying low and avoiding the press, Maria goes to Spain and defends her father in open court.  It's a huge trial and she takes an awful chance on her career, but really she is keeping her values and her honesty in a business where that isn't easy.  Back in Hollywood she tires of being under contract to (and under the thumb of, really) Kirk Edwards.  It comes to a head during a fancy society party and she agrees to go with Kirk's enemy, Alberto Bravano (Marius Goring) to Monte Carlo.  Oscar goes with her (as we learn since he has taken over the narration now), having quit Kirk and joined up with Bravano as well.  He describes Bravano's extravagance and quick temper, which he takes out on Maria, who doesn't at all fit in with the high society set.  Not only does she still keep company with lower class workers and gypsies, she has a string of lovers.  But when Bravano finally goes too far and verbally attacks Maria in the hotel, a handsome stranger steps in and defends her.  The stranger walks off with Maria as if in a dream and then we switch to the stranger's narration.  He is Count Vincenzo Torlato-Favrini (Rossano Brazzi) and he had seen Maria earlier dancing barefoot in a gypsy camp as he drove to Monte Carlo.  For him it was kismet that they meet again at the hotel and that he swoop in to defend her.  They have a quick, lovely romance back at his villa in Italy, where he decides to make her the last Contessa.  Harry picks up again, recounting when he had gone to Italy for a picture and run into Maria as she was about to marry Vincenzo.  In Harry's words, "the Prince had finally caught up with Cinderella and all that was left was the slipper business."  Maria marries her Prince alright, but the marriage is a far cry from the happy, Disney-style fairy tales when we learn exactly what Vincenzo meant by calling her the "last Contessa."  His meaning, however, takes a much darker twist, ending with the death of Maria.

Highlights
I really liked that Harry Dawes was a writer-director, as that writing side came out with his great narration.  Vincenzo and Oscar did a good job with their stories, but Harry's is the stuff that sticks.  He's got some wonderful lines in here, besides the slipper one.  On describing Edwards, Harry says "he had as much in common with anything creative as I have with nuclear physics."  My favorite line though is "Life every now and then behaves as if it's seen too many bad movies; everything fits too well."  Not only is the writing good, but the delivery is impeccable.  It reminded me a great deal of Joe Gillis in Sunset Boulevard, which makes sense as both characters are writers disenchanted by Hollywood after having hit its rocky bottom.

Another note on the narration - I really loved the set up for Bogart.  There in funeral, in the pouring rain, we get his gravelly, nasal, distinctively weary voice and the camera passes over all of the mourners in black, hiding under black umbrellas and then we see Harry Dawes, no umbrella, just an old raincoat with the collar turned up, standing apart.  It sets up his character well.  I think it's risky to reveal the death of a character (especially the title character) right at the beginning, but the overall story and the changing narration helps to keep The Barefoot Contessa moving and interesting.  I think it works so well because we want to know where the fairy tale went horribly wrong.  I did want to hear it from her point of view, but I guess telling it from the outside creates more of a legend, of a woman on a pedestal or out of a story book.  I was miffed that her story is told by three men (come on, people!  Couldn't we get Jerry a story line?  She was awesome as Harry's wisecracking girlfriend!) though truth be told, I'm glad that Kirk didn't get a narration, because he was a bit possessive and creepy.  I'm wondering now if Maria's really long monologue when Harry finds her is really her way of narrating (since they can't make a dead person talk, unlike Sunset Boulevard).  Now I realize that's probably why we have that scene; I was annoyed at first that Ava Gardner was talking so much and for so long to this guy she just met, but in the overall storytelling purposes I think I can understand.   

Now what about all this fairy tale business?  What is it about marrying the idea of a perfect life and romance with the dark side of Hollywood?  We've seen it in many films that focus on the film industry, but The Barefoot Contessa goes out of its way to make Maria into a Spanish Cinderella.  What's really interesting to me is the duality of her character as both this honest, loyal woman wanting a perfect romance but still a bit rough around the edges and unprepared for the curve ball Vincenzo throws (oh, you know you want to watch now so you can see it!).  But in reality, we didn't need to make her a film star or get her involved with Hollywood at all to make the story work - Sabrina didn't send Audrey Hepburn to Hollywood; it sent her to Paris.  So what is it about this industry of dream-making that is both so hopeful and attractive, but also so crushingly sad? (Ha, another duality!)  Why doesn't the dream work?  Is it that when something is too well put together, like one of Harry's "bad movies" it is bound to fall apart?  Is it that the dream creators see behind the gossamer and paper cutouts and the dream is lost on them?  What does that say about our own cynical culture?  There are so many questions, and films like The Barefoot Contessa, The Bad and The Beautiful and Sunset Boulevard do a wonderful job of trying to find answers.  The mystery of film-making isn't beautiful from the inside.  All that glitters is not gold, but can look like it in Technicolor.  Lastly, would this movie have been as good or as powerful if she had lived?  What if it had a Sabrina type ending where Prince Charming and his Cinderella lived happily ever after?  Does Maria set her own course for sadness and disappointment (and death)?  It's an interesting perspective on destiny and one I'd like to consider as I re-watch this great film.

As if to reinforce my point, I heard a great back story from TCM host Robert Osborne.  It was something I had actually suspected while watching and was really interested to hear afterward.  Bogart and Gardner have a great relationship on screen - their characters are great, they seem like a matched pair.  Harry even refers to himself as her "fairy godfather" at one point.  You'd think they would get along swell off screen - Ava Garnder was a self-possessed, confident, hard drinking, straight talking kind of woman - Bogart's kind of woman.  However, in 1954 Ava had just ended (though not officially by divorce; that would come in 1957) her rocky marriage to Frank Sinatra, Bogart's good friend and member of Bogie's Rat Pack.  So Bogart and Gardner weren't exactly friends by any means.  It always amazes me at how that kind of animosity can be so well camouflaged by darn good acting.     

Review and Recommendation
I highly recommend The Barefoot Contessa.  It's a fascinating look based on the real life rise of Rita Hayworth, who married Prince Aly Khan (but didn't have the whole devastating ending) and some aspects of Gardner's life as well.  It's a great story with depth and beauty that will leave you rethinking all those happy ending fairy tales.

*One additional side note: I had no idea Muldoon had been played by Edmond O'Brien, whom I had seen and loved in an earlier film, a film noir called The Killers.  Guess who co-starred with him in that picture?  Ava Gardner.  I love these connections!  He does a good job here in The Barefoot Contessa; well enough to earn an Academy Award. 
 
*Also, one major gripe.  Remember how I said women don't have a voice in this movie?  I just saw the film's tagline on IMDb: "The world's most beautiful animal!"  Is that for real?  I hope not.  Maria is a strong woman with a definite mind and will of her own, not an animal.  I'm angry about this, but really, I don't want to rant, because I'd ruin such a great movie if I went on about this poor marketing line.  So watch it and decide for yourself.
     

Executive Suite (1954)

A slice of 50's Americana, complete with little league baseball and the world of high finance business.

Intro.

I'm taking a break from my November writing challenge to update this blog.  I had watched Executive Suite awhile back, and want to write about while it's still fresh in my mind.  November was supposed to be dedicated to Westerns, and it will be, but for now I'm focusing just on what I have time to watch and review.  At a modest 104 minutes, the film promised to be tight and easy to follow.  Plus it featured June Allyson and William Holden, so of course I had to watch.

Overview

Executive Suite focuses on the lives and struggles of half a dozen Board members trying to find a replacement when their chair and CEO of Tredway Corporation, Avery Bullard, drops dead on the sidewalk outside.  We get a good sense of characters from the beginning, when each is called in for a six o'clock conference with the CEO, and then one by one as they find out what has happened.  George Caswell (Louis Calhern) witnesses the death first and immediately calls his stock broker.  He is then at risk to lose his shirt when the quarterly sales reports are released at the same time, which causes the stock to rise, not fall as he had predicted.  The woman in love with Avery, Julia Tredway (Barbara Stanwyck), is crushed by his death, even contemplating suicide, despite the fact that he never had time for her when he was alive.  Perhaps the most touching response is that of his friend and Vice President of Design and Engineering, McDonald "Don" Walling (William Holden).  Don still holds Avery's original ideas - that of expanding and growing, that the company should be dedicated to progress and making furniture in which they could all take pride, not just something fast and cheap to make a quick profit.  Unfortunately, the main candidate to take over as CEO, Loren Shaw (Fredric March), is an accountant who is only interested in dollars and cents, not about the workers' integrity.  A corporate battle erupts, filled with power plays and unofficial meetings.  Finally Don puts his name in for president and comes head to head with Shaw at the final Board meeting.

Highlights

I loved how this film opened.  The camera shot from Avery's point of view, moving with him, seeing the reaction of people to "his" presence.  In this sense, the audience becomes Avery, making him not only a great man of power, but in a sense, the everyman (and woman).  It ends, of course, when he dies in the first five minutes, but it's a powerful enough opening and an interesting one.  I can't think of any other film which featured that as the opening sequence.  It ties in nicely to the narration just before which says that those people way up in the executive suites of all those skyscrapers aren't high and above temptation. 

The acting was very good in this film.  I particularly loved June Allyson, who didn't just fall into the dutiful wife role - she's the one telling her husband Don what to do, even suggesting that he take the position.  She's also a great mother, stepping in to play catch with their son when Don has to go off on meetings.  I really liked watching their dynamic - Holden and Allyson - as they portrayed a typical American couple of the fifties.  But what really impressed me was Barbara Stanwyck, who is her usual dynamic self.  I loved seeing her and William Holden reunite in this film, and although their scene alone together is too short, it is still one of the best in the whole picture.

I'm not sure what exactly to write about Executive Suite.  It was a well constructed film, pretty easy to follow and an interesting look at the culture's view of business in the 1950s.  Holden's characteristic cynicism is rampant throughout the process, that is right up until his final speech about saving the company and saving themselves (against a lovely stained-glass window too - should we call him St. Don?).  It's a cry against big business and manufacturing - against disrespecting the factory workers and saving their jobs, their livelihoods, their self-respect.  It reminded me in part of some of the 1930s films with respect to the rage against factory labor and bosses not caring about the "little people" who worked behind the scenes.  It's important that Don then gets the vote, because he is introduced not in on office suite, but down in the factory, working alongside the others to test a new molding process.  Don comes to represent the best intentions of the building and progress boom of the forties and fifties - build it bigger, faster, better.  Improve the world through business.  But Don is rare amongst his peers, giving us an awful feeling of encroaching corruption.  Had this movie been made in in the 1960s or later, I'm sure Don would have become president only to lose his own self-respect, to neglect his family and even worse, to become himself just as awful as the people he once hated.  It says a lot about the culture that none of this addressed, that it ends instead on a positive note.  I left the movie feeling empty, wondering how long would Don be able to hold onto his ideals of progress.  It almost broke my heart that he won; but at the end he is still the family man at heart and I hope he remained that way. 

Review and Recommendation
I liked this movie.  It's not one of my favorites and I'm not sure I'll watch it again for awhile, but it still poses some interesting questions and I think is a great piece of Hollywood history.  I recommend it for history buffs studying the 1950s and those interested in the presentation of business in American film. 

P.S. I should mention that the film lost me about halfway through with a lot of complications around Calhoun's character's work with the stock market.  He arranged for a short sell, but didn't have the stock so he was going to go broke when the stock price rose.  Anyway, I used to work for a financial publisher, and I had some trouble following at first.  Then I realized we weren't really supposed to understand - these were the tycoons talking, those who didn't care about the common people on the ground floor or in the audience.  They literally don't "speak our language".  It's a brilliant contrast to straight-shooting Holden. 

Dial M for Murder (1954)

And I thought telemarketers were bad.

Intro.

As I've mentioned before, I love Hitchcock.  The more I watch his films, the greater I can appreciate his great camerawork and attention to detail.  So when I noticed Dial M for Murder in the television listings recently, I had to catch up on one of his films I hadn't seen before.  And this time I actually saw Hitchcock hidden in the film!

Overview 

At the beginning, Tony (Ray Milland) and Margot (Grace Kelly) appear to be a perfectly happy married couple.  That is, until we realize that Margot's returning friend Mark (Robert Cummings) was more than just her friend.  Margot tells Mark that although their affair ended a year ago, Tony's been acting strangely.  What's worse is that the only letter she kept from Mark was stolen awhile ago, and although she paid the mysterious blackmailer, she never received the letter back.  She and Mark go out for the evening, as Tony says he has to stay home and get work done.  His "work" consists of meeting an old college acquaintance, Captain Lesgate (Anthony Dawson).  More like blackmailing, that is.  Mark's been plotting the perfect murder ever since he discovered Margot's affair.  It wasn't so much jealousy as it was a way to get her money.  He's spent weeks tailing Lesgate, discovering many petty crimes and name changes along the way.  What's more he offers $1,000 - money which Lesgate desperately needs.  He describes the murder, complete with alibis - Tony and Mark will be away at a stag dinner, Tony will call at 11:00 pm, Margot will come out of her room and answer the phone at the desk.  Lesgate will have retrieved a key from outside and let himself in to hide behind the curtains.  After she answers the phone, Lesgate simply strangles her, then the murder is over and no one needs to know.  The phone call is the key.  Well, nothing seems to go exactly to plan - Margot wants to go out instead of staying home, then Tony's watch stops and finally while she's being strangled, Margot fights back and -whoops!- kills Lesgate!!  Tony has to think fast as to how to frame Margot and plants the missing love letter on Lesgate.  Although Margot is arrested and tried for murder, the police chief Hubbard (John Williams) and Mark (who conveniently is an American mystery writer) aren't convinced.  Can they prove Margot's innocence before she is executed?      

Highlights

I'm often told that I'm too detail oriented.  I'm not so sure this is always a bad thing.  Hitchcock's stories come alive because of the attention to detail.  Both in the plot itself and the characters, he has a keen eye for what matters and every line, every motion adds something vital to the story.  It's almost like watching a Hemingway story come to life - there is no room for extraneous dialogue or scene setting.  Instantly we become engaged and engrossed in this film.  What's more, Tony goes to the trouble of explaining exactly what's going to happen and how.  Then later in the film, Mark figures out what really happened and suggests that Tony "make up" the same story in order to get Margot a stay of execution.  It all comes down to the smallest of clues (which I won't reveal, don't worry).

The acting is also very well done in this film.  Grace Kelly is always a delight and she is wonderful in this role.  I was so happy when she killed Lesgate - a true victory for women!  It reminded me a lot of her stand in High Noon but I don't think I should really give that ending away either.  Anyway, she is wonderful.  I also really enjoyed watching Ray Milland as the evil mastermind - I don't recall if I've seen many of his films before, but if he's in any more thrillers, I'm going to add them to my list!  Cummings and Williams both made strong supporting actors, and I loved how the Inspector refused to give up even after the trial.  He steals the show in the final scene.

Finally, a brief mention of the amazing cinematography.  As always, the camera angles and frames comment on the film itself.  I particularly enjoyed the lower camera position as it looked up at Tony while he discussed his twisted plan with Lesgate.  The near-strangulation is also very well done with all the suspense and horror we expect from Hitchcock.  I also like how he snuck into the photo of Tony's college reunion, since most shots in this film are only inside the apartment, leaving little time for him to make his famous appearance elsewhere.  I always get excited when I find him - there are still quite a few films where I haven't seen him.  All the more reason to keep watching!

Review and Recommendation

One of Hitchcock's best films, Dial M for Murder has a tight, fascinating plot, and a story with more twists and turns than an intestine.  Okay, bad analogy, but you get the idea.  I recommend it as the standout type of murder mystery where we're let in on the who/what/why beforehand and the fun comes in following the capture of the criminal.  Great for Hitchcock fans, thriller fans, Grace Kelly fans and really, anyone with any movie taste. 

Sabrina (1954)

Bogart's a little too old, Holden's a little too blond, but Audrey is just right.

Intro.

I think everyone is familiar with the story of Sabrina. An ordinary girl falls in love with a rich man who doesn't know she exists, she goes away and transforms into a lady and upon her return, he falls in love with her.  There's more to it, of course, but at its heart, Sabrina is in every sense a Cinderella story.  With a seemingly perfect combination like Billy Wilder, William Holden, Humphrey Bogart and Audrey Hepburn, Paramount was excited to see what a great film would be created.  They were right, though the off-screen story was far from a fairy-tale.

Overview
"Once upon a time, on the North Shore of Long Island, some thirty miles from New York, there lived a small girl on a large estate."  So begins the story of Sabrina Fairchild (Audrey Hepburn), the timid young daughter of the chauffer employed by the very wealthy Larrabee family.  She is in love with the younger of the Larrabee sons, David (William Holden), who is a playboy with three divorces to his name and no work ethic.  That ethic is instead present in his older brother, Linus (Humphrey Bogart), who is a regular workaholic with no time for fun.  Distraught because David doesn't know she exists, Sabrina tries to commit suicide, only to be stopped by Linus.  Her father has saved his money and sends her to Paris the next day to cooking school.  Over the next two years, she not only learns how to cook, but also how to live and returns to Long Island as a sophisticated, knowledgeable and absolutely beautiful lady.  David is quick to notice her now and finds himself ignoring his fiancee in favor of Sabrina.  Linus won't stand for that, though, as David's marriage is part of a company merger in a multi-million dollar plastics manufacturing deal.  So Linus decides to distract Sabrina so that she'll forget about David; he'll even pay her off it that's what it takes.  None of them expect what happens next, as Linus learns to loosen up some and winds up falling for Sabrina himself.  When Sabrina gets two tickets to sail back to Paris, just who will accompany her?   
 

Highlights

Sabrina has all of the charm and humor of a classic romantic comedy.  It is one of the best examples of the genre and I believe a lot of that has to do with the fine writing and even finer performances.  You can tell Bogart and Holden are well versed in acting, and even though this was only Audrey Hepburn's second film, she is captivating and ideal for the role.  I know I wouldn't want to be in her shoes as Sabrina, having to choose between Linus and David.  What a sweet, funny movie.  Sabrina proves my point that a great film doesn't need violence, awful language or sex to be entertaining.  I swear if you don't at least smile when David is getting broken glass removed from his rear end (yes, he sat on two champagne glasses) and Linus calls out "goodbye, Scarface," you don't have a sense of humor.

As I mentioned above, the back-stage story is even more interesting than the one on the celluloid.  I have a DVD of Sabrina, and watched the short documentary for the first time.  Like the film it was upbeat, innocent and featured a voice-over that sounded more like a trailer introduction than a documentary.  Originally Cary Grant had held the role of Linus, but had to back out one week before shooting began.  Paramount needed an older, well-established star and turned to Bogart.  This was unlike any role he had previously held, and he was excited for it.  He even remarked during production that "if I were as handsome as Bill Holden, I wouldn't have any doubts as to why Bacall married me."  That's all well and good, but I knew something was a bit off, so I pulled out my copy of Bogart by A.M. Sperber and Eric Lax (a fabulous book that I highly recommend!) and checked into it.

There's a very funny story from Bogart.  In 1939, Bogart was a bit upset that he took fourth billing after much younger William Holden in a film called Invisible Stripes.  On set, Holden insisted on doing a stunt by himself, where he drove a motorcycle with Bogart as the passenger.  The book has it written this way: "Bogart objected - 'That S.O.B., he'll crack it up!' - but Holden insisted. He promptly ran the bike into a wall.  Only egos were injured. (pg. 103)"  No wonder Bogart was a bit leary when he worked with Holden again. 

According to Sperber and Lax, Bogart was excited to do Sabrina, but that excitement faded once he realized that Holden and director Wilder were already buddies (they had just made Sunset Boulevard and Stalag 17 together), and along with young Hepburn, they formed a sort of clique that left the older star out in the cold.  As they wrote in their biography, Sperber and Lax talked about the private meetings and lunches between the others.  "Evidently no one thought of inviting Bogart.  Then again, probably no one observing one of the biggest stars in Hollywood, with one of the loveliest women waiting for him at home, would have guessed the wells of insecurity tapped by this exclusion." (pg. 492)  He just wanted to be asked, to be recognized.  He became difficult to work with, arguing and throwing tantrums, though he wasn't the only difficult one - Wilder was just as difficult, and would sometimes get Hepburn to pretend to be sick because he didn't have the day's script finished yet.  None of those problems show in the finished film, however.  Bogart and Wilder made peace a few years later, but what happened during the filming of Sabrina is still a part of Hollywood history.

One last point I should make is that the Paramount costume and wardrobe designer was Edith Head, whom I adore.  She designed all the gowns in What a Way to Go! and those absolutely jaw-dropping dresses for Grace Kelly in Rear Window.  So when Audrey Hepburn decided to ask new fashion designer Hubert de Givenchy to make her clothes for the post-Paris part of the film, I was a bit disappointed.  Not by the gowns, because they are gorgeous.  Still, I should say it must have been harder to make dresses for Audrey Hepburn that made her pretty but still a bit school-girlish.  And those were entrusted to Edith, who did as wonderful a job as ever.  I think I have a bit of a crush on her, or at least on her work.

Review and Recommendation
Sorry to make this such a long post!  All in all, Sabrina is a true classic.  Funny, charming and sweet, it's a perfect example of a romantic-comedy.  I highly recommend it for the great acting, the beautiful Audrey Hepburn, and those early dresses from Edith Head.  Can I say the obvious tagline?  Let your heart be stolen by Sabrina!

P.S. Bogart really is one of the best biographies I've ever read.  Maybe even the best.  It's by A. M. Sperber and Eric Lax, published by William Morrow and Company, New York, 1997.  No copyright infringement intended. 

River of No Return (1954)

Intro. 

Do you ever have those days that are so long and so tiring that all you want is to curl up with a good book or lose yourself in a good movie?  That's the way I felt the other day.  I came home and collapsed and flipped through some saved movies until I came to River of No Return.  Ironically, I had just finished the book You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Kills You by Robert Randisi.  It's the latest entry in his Rat Pack fanfiction murder mystery series.  I hate to say it, but  I am completely hooked on these books.  This one had Marilyn Monroe being stalked and Dean Martin hires the hero, Eddie Gianelli, to protect her.  Anyway, in the book, Marilyn tells Eddie she feels as safe with him as she did with Robert Mitchum when they were shooting River of No Return in the Canadian Rockies.  Of course, my thought was "I'd feel safe with Robert Mitchum too!"  Which meant, when I needed a good film to watch after my exhausting day, I had to pick this one.

Overview
Matt Calder (Mitchum) plays a farmer reunited with his young son Mark (Tommy Rettig) in a new, gold-hungry mining town.  The two make it back to their riverside farm and try to get used to each other again when a raft with two people on board gets into trouble near their house.  Matt helps the couple reach land only to find that the man is a gambler, Harry Weston (Rory Calhoun) who has won a gold mine in a poker game.  His wife Kay (Marilyn Monroe), who immediately doesn't get along with stoic, conservative Matt,  bonds quickly with curious, good-natured and innocent Mark.  As Harry lacks any rafting skills, he cannot go any further down the river to the main town to file his new claim.  He instead holds up Matt and steals his only rifle and only horse, leaving the father and son defenseless against the Native Americans, who have already started burning houses nearby.  Kay stays behind to care for Matt, who has been knocked unconscious by Harry.  After Harry leaves, Matt awakens and takes Mark and Kay onto the raft, narrowly missing an attack from the Native Americans.  They watch helplessly as their home is burned and Matt vows to kill Harry.  From there the threesome travel through the roughest parts of the river called "River of No Return," nearly drowning, fighting chills and fever, eating what little they can find or catch and generally trying to get along with each other but failing.  We find out that Harry and Kay aren't married yet and that the reason Matt was away from Mark and his mother was that he was in jail for shooting a man in the back.  Mark overhears this, causing another problem in this already troubled group.  Matt and Kay continue to hold some contempt for each other, and no sooner does it start to ease then Matt tries to force himself on Kay.  He gets interrupted by an attack from a mountain lion, but the damage is done.  At long last the trio survive the worst rapids and make it safely to the town.  Matt allows Kay to see Harry first, to talk to him and try and stop the two men from a fight.  Harry pushes Kay aside and goes after Matt, only to be shot and killed.  I won't give it all away, but it's one of the best ending scenes I've seen...well, right up until the last two minutes.

Highlights

One of the things that this movie does well is how the characters are formed.  Just when you think Matt is an alright, square kind of guy he goes and tries to rape Kay.  What?  I know, I was yelling at him the whole time.  But it keeps his character interesting, and his anger is clearly still just below the surface.  The other thing that works is the dialogue.  I was just talking about this film earlier and said that it's frustrating because the characters talk about things that don't matter and don't talk about things that do matter.  We're left wondering about Matt's dead wife.  Does he blame himself for her death?  Does he think Kay looks like her and that's why he has trouble with her?  Those are questions that should be answered by the acting, not the telling, which I think both Mitchum and Monroe do very well.  And the ending - I won't give anything away, but how it all comes full circle is pretty wonderful.  Not to mention pretty daring for the time too.

A Few Complaints

I've read a few mixed reviews on this film, and I have to say I have a few mixed feelings too.  The aspects I liked also bothered me a bit too.  For example, I loved the dynamic ending, but I felt that after the killing of Harry the film should have ended with Kay in the saloon singing the title song.  Instead there is a minute or two after her song that are too simple, too neat and too Hollywood.  I think they put it in to appease some viewers who probably had an issue with the way the shooting happened.  Or perhaps it was just to go with conventions of the day.  It would be interesting to see it now  in a remake, although no one today could probably convey that same inner turmoil and complexity Mitchum did.  And no one can even come close to being Marilyn Monroe.

And finally, just to appease my fangirl nature, I have to say that I was at first disappointed that Robert Mitchum doesn't get to sing in this film.  Marilyn Monroe does as a saloon entertainer and also as a sort of mother for Mark.  I know it would have been out of character for Matt to join Kay in singing, but part of me wished he had, even if only for the closing credits.

Review
What's great about this movie is that these are not average, well-adjusted people.  They are broken, weary and just trying to survive the elements and each other.  They don't form this perfect, happy little family.  It's a rare Western drama that is subtle and deep just as much as it is sweeping and dramatic.  Although there are some problems with plot and sometimes even with the characters (not to mention those awful last two minutes), I feel that this is a fine movie and I recommend it.  It was perfect to unwind and enjoy such a great leading man and leading lady in a fairly good and well-rounded film.

Johnny Guitar (1954)

Intro.

I've been looking for Westerns with women in strong leading roles, so when I read the summary of Johnny Guitar, I knew it was a film I had to see.  The write-up called it a "cult classic" of director Nicolas Ray, and starred Joan Crawford and Mercedes McCambridge as feuding businesswomen in the old West.  With supporting actors like Ward Bond, Ernest Borgnine and John Carradine, I was sure it would be a real treat.

Overview

Johnny Guitar (Sterling Hayden) has been hired by saloon-keeper Vienna (Joan Crawford) to come out to her establishment in the middle of nowhere Arizona.  On his way, he witnesses four men hold up a stagecoach.  He no sooner gets to the saloon when a posse comes in with a dead body - the man killed in the holdup.  The dead man's sister happens to be Emma Smalls, who owns the bank and practically all of the town.  She also has a deep hatred for Vienna, and demands Vienna to give them the men who robbed the stage.  As it turns out, Vienna is friends with four "outsiders" - cowboys who aren't quite criminals but also aren't quite the upstanding-citizen type.  These cowboys, led by The Dancing Kid (Scott Brady), are the prime suspects, but Vienna won't turn them over.  Unfortunately the Kid and his group come into the saloon at that point and a real stare-down leads to a lot of hot tempers, drawn guns and a lot of yelling (the yelling is mostly from the always fantastic Ward Bond who plays Emma's friend and ranch-owner McIvers).  McIvers finally gives Vienna and her crew 24 hours to clear out and the dispute fizzles out.  Vienna decides to send her crew away, lets the Kid and his gang (who really didn't rob the stage) get off to their hide-out and waits for the posse to come for her.  She isn't leaving.  Apparently, neither is her saloon-singer Johnny, who we learn is not only a former gunslinger, but her former lover.  Johnny is clearly still in love with Vienna, but she has yet to forgive him for leaving her five years ago.  The Kid and his gang decide to rob the town bank during the dead man's funeral, and as Vienna is in the bank at the time (and left unharmed), she is accused of being their leader.  Emma leads the town posse after the boys and then after Vienna.  It all ends with a lot of action, including arson, fistfights, a hanging, a shoot-out and a final showdown between the two women.

Highlights & Other Points

First of all, I have to point out the supporting cast.  Ernest Borgnine was great as the trouble-making selfish cowboy Bart.  You both hated and liked him.  I also liked seeing Ward Bond, even if his character was rather one-dimensional and not on nearly long enough.  Some other familiar faces included Frank Ferguson as the Marshal and Paul Fix as Eddie.  And of course there is the scene-stealer, John Carradine.  His death scene is wonderful as he utters that it's the first time everyone paid attention to him.  I also read on IMDb that Joan Crawford had originally wanted Claire Trevor in the role of Emma Smalls.  I kind of wish she had, as it would've been wonderful to see her and John Carradine together again.

I've read several reviews for this film on the Turner Classic Movies website, and I'm not too sure what to think.  Some people seem to love this film while others despise it.  There are a few areas that need to be pointed out - first the color.  There is color EVERYWHERE in this film.  And not just a variety of colors, but big, bold, outstanding colors.  I did notice though that it depended on the people - Joan Crawford is the larger than life saloon-keeper, already a rarity because she is a woman in such a position.  Her attitude is as bold as her wardrobe; also, she doesn't start wearing dresses until after she and Johnny get back together.  On the other side are the townspeople lead by Emma and McIvers.  After the bank robbery, which triggers a lot of fast moving action, the posse is all dressed alike in their funeral clothes, sort of like a dark, somber army.   

Aside from the clothes, the most noticeable feature of this film is the acting.  It feels too forced, too over-the-top.  In fact, as I watched I couldn't help but feel like this was a stage play and the actors needed to do everything possible to make their emotions palpable.  There is very little subtlety here.  I'm not sure if it is intentional or not, but in many ways the movie reminded me of a melodrama.  It was most evident in the scenes between Johnny and Vienna, who go to emotional extremes over their lost-then-rekindled romance.  I can't help but wonder if the obvious issues the two main women have with relationships might be a result of going against the standard genre rules (I mean, women toting guns?  Leading a posse? Running a town?).  The saving grace was that each time Vienna and Johnny got a bit too carried away, some action happened that changed the plot.  Still, it is hard to look past the feel and style of the film, although I did read that the over-stylized nature and over-dramatic plot both inspired Sergio Leone's Once Upon a Time in the West.  Sounds like another review waiting to happen!

Review

I think if you watch Johnny Guitar knowing that it is Western Melodrama, you might be more open to it.  It's not the worst film I've seen, but also not the best.  What it lacks in acting, movement and overdone love scenes it makes up for in action, plot and leading ladies.  And honestly, any Western with two such strong female leads is so rare, it's worth watching at least once.

Fun fact: Joan Crawford and Mercedes McCambridge fought not only on-screen, but off-screen as well.  According to some reports, Joan Crawford even took all of Mercedes' wardrobe and threw them out along an Arizona highway!  Good thing those guns on set weren't loaded for real!  Read more at TCM.com.