Showing posts with label horror. Show all posts
Showing posts with label horror. Show all posts

Monday, November 1, 2010

House of Wax (1953)

Further proof that my uneasiness in wax museums is completely justified.

Intro.
I definitely went through classic movie phases even as a kid.  There was a period where all I wanted to watch were musicals and then came old horror films.  My favorite horror film was the original House of Wax, starring my favorite horror movie actor, Vincent Price.  I can remember going to the local video store and making a beeline straight to the Classics section and asking my mom to rent it again and again.  I hadn't seen the movie in something close to twelve years, and was delighted that it was featured on TCM this Halloween.   

Overview
Vincent Price stars as Prof. Henry Jarrod, a gifted sculptor of wax figures.  His museum, studio and home are all in one building, and the small space, while filled with well-crafted figures from history, fails to draw in as many crowds as other wax museums which feature scenes of torture and horrors.  His partner Matthew Burke (Roy Roberts) wants a return on his investment, and losing his patience, sets fire to the museum.  Jarrod cannot bear to part with his "children" as he calls his wax figures, and many believe he dies in the fire with them.  In the aftermath, we see a strange, misshapen man in a black cape appear in Burke's room and kill him, hanging him in the elevator shaft.  It's a ghastly crime, and only made worse when the scene is revealed in a brand new wax museum specializing in the macabre and recent headlines in crime.  Running this new museum is Jarrod, who is now wheelchair bound and without fine motor control in his hands.  His apprentices now carve his figures under his guidance, and he is determined to recreate all of his best pieces.  One of the couples visiting his grand opening are Sue Allen (Phyllis Kirk) and Scott Andrews (Paul Picerni).  Sue's dear friend Cathy (Carolyn Jones) was recently murdered, and Sue had walked in on the murder - the same man in black who killed Burke.  Once at the museum, Sue can't help but notice the similarity between the figure of Joan of Arc and Cathy.  Every line of Cathy's face is there, right down to her only having one ear pierced.  Jarrod explains that he often uses photographs from the newspaper as models for his work, but Sue isn't convinced.  Scott begins working for Jarrod as well, and begins work on a new Marie Antoinette, using Sue's face as a model.  But of course this creepy film gets even spookier when Sue goes into the museum one night alone to get another close-up view of Joan of Arc (seriously, how does she think that's a good idea?).  Of course she discovers that Joan actually is Cathy, and Jarrod and his other assistants decide to make her a permanent fixture of the museum.  Can Scott and the police save her?  And just who is it among them that's been killing people across the city?

Highlights
I love Vincent Price.  In any horror film, he adds a certain level of creepiness.  Not only is his voice pitch perfect for any horror film (in fact his is also the voice you hear in "Thriller"), but he is also a  remarkable actor.  It's so easy to forget how good of an actor he really was when you watch films designed to showcase other things (like the novelty of 3D effects).  But he's always a great actor to watch and to learn from*, and I think part of the reason I was so drawn to this film was because of his work.  He is so easy to admire and empathize with from the beginning, then we see his change after the fire and the loss of his world.  It's as much about his loss of sanity as it is about Sue's own descent into what she fears is madness.  She just has to know if it's really Cathy beneath that layer of wax.  It's a good thing she does question it too, for her story starts the police investigating into Jarrod's life.

House of Wax was a remake of an early horror film from the 1930s, but was remade at this particular time in Hollywood for two reasons.  One, it would make a great showpiece shot in color and second it could be made into 3D to attract movie audiences.  Theaters were losing business in the 50s with the widespread ownership of television, so many sensational tactics began deployment in the film industry.  3D effects were one of those ideas, and did bring viewers in to see films like House of Wax.  While I have not seen the film in 3D, I can attest to the brilliance of color in the movie, with particular attention paid to the details of the wax figurines.  It's very well shot and composed, with a good eye for color.  It is also very amusing to see which shots were constructed solely for the purpose of coming right at the camera for that 3D effect.  The hawker outside Jarrod's new museum is the most out of place, having no effect on the plot and interacting directly with the audience with his paddle-board.  It's an amusing reminder of the fad and a reminder of what was once on the cutting edge of Hollywood.    

There were a few things I didn't particularly like in the film on this viewing, particularly the supporting characters.  It's most apparent with Cathy, but several of them are a bit stereotyped and almost corny, as is the bad pun which ends the film.  Still, I have to admit that the novelty of wax museums and the drawing power of Vincent Price makes this an enjoyable film.  It's still one of my favorite horror films, although I may still be biased towards my childhood favorites.  And the scene where Jarrod's true face is revealed (arg, I can't really make this spoiler-free) still makes me gasp.  That's what always terrified me as a child and today it still gives me the creeps.

Before I sign off, one quick funny story.  As I began to write this post, I looked up House of Wax on IMDb, because I knew that Jarrod's assistant Igor had looked really familiar.  Turns out it was a very early appearance by Charles Bronson, who was listed in the credits as Charles Buchinsky.  I just told my friend who had also watched with me, and we both said in tandem "I knew he looked familiar!"

Review and Recommendation
Although a bit stereotyped and somewhat predictable, House of Wax is still a very enjoyable film and an example of new techniques tried in the 1950s.  A wonderful vehicle for Vincent Price (and probably one of his best performances), I definitely recommend it to anyone who wants a more tame horror film.  What a great way to wrap up my month of horror films!

*I've seen Vincent Price in only two non-horror films, one of which was His Kind of Woman.  Now, you talk about an acting range - I almost didn't recognize him because he was so funny!  Of course, his voice was unmistakable.  :-)          

The Walking Dead (1936)

Boris Karloff as a zombie.  Or no, he's not a zombie.  Or maybe he is.  We really aren't sure.
Intro.

As Halloween approached, I realized that I had reviewed a Bela Lugosi film, but not a Boris Karloff one.  Recently my friend Catherine has been lending me copies of the comic book series The Walking Dead, so I took it as no coincidence when I saw the listing on TCM for a film by the same name.  I decided to watch and realized that it was unlike any monster movie I had expected.

Overview
The Walking Dead begins with the conviction of a man associated with a group of high-society racketeers.  Although everyone thinks he'll be acquitted, the judge sentences him to ten years without parole.  His partners, still outside the law, decide to hire a hitman to kill the judge.  Meanwhile, John Ellman (Boris Karloff) has just come out of prison after serving his time and gets a job from a detective to shadow the judge, who is suspected of adultery.  Things take an unexpected turn when the hitman kills the judge and leaves him in Ellman's car.  The only two witnesses are Nancy (Marguerite Churchill) and Jimmy (Warren Hull), but the hitman threatens to kill them if they utter one word about it.  Ellman discovers the judge's body (and it's the same judge who sentenced Ellman years ago), and is arrested for the murder.  One of the racketeers, Nolan (Ricardo Cortez), is a lawyer and defends Ellman at trial.  And by defends, I mean, makes certain that Ellman is convicted and sentenced to the electric chair.  So right at the eleventh hour, Jimmy and Nancy come forward to try and save Ellman's life, confiding in their boss, the scientist Dr. Evan Beaumont (Edmund Gwenn).  Nolan intercepts the call and purposefully delays getting a stay of execution.  The governor's phone call finally comes to the jail at midnight, just seconds after Ellman is electrocuted.  He's declared dead, but Dr. Beaumont insists on collecting his body instead of sending him to the morgue.  Conveniently, Beaumont happens to have all the equipment needed to hook up Ellman's body and jolt it back to life.  It's never been done before, but he and Nancy and Jimmy succeed at bringing Ellman back from the dead.  It isn't all happy endings though, as Ellman comes back with no memory and no ability to walk or talk or anything.  With a lot of work, he is finally able to walk (though he seriously walks like Romero's zombies) and slowly regains both memory and speech, aided by his love of the piano.  Dr. Beaumont hosts a concert for Ellman, with the purpose of showing off his amazing scientific achievement.  The police also arrange for all of the racketeers to arrive, to judge their reactions to seeing Ellman alive.  Sure enough, Ellman somehow knows exactly who was responsible for his death, and goes after each man in the nights afterwards.  He confronts each one with the question "Why did you have me killed?" and one by one each man dies, though not all by Ellman's hands.  On his last night with Beaumont, Ellman sneaks out to the cemetery.  But he's followed by Nancy, who is concerned for his safety, and she in turn is followed by the racketeers.  It all comes to an end in the cemetery where Ellman dies and this time stays dead, keeping his knowledge of the afterlife a secret.

Highlights
I have to admit, this film took me by surprise.  I expected it to be a typical B-horror film from the 30's with plenty of women screaming and creepy monsters lurking about.  Instead, I found it to be a psychologically thrilling film that really has a lot going for it.  Boris Karloff, first of all, is amazing.  I know he's often cast as Frankenstein and you can't really look at him without imaging bolts coming out of his neck, but as a wrongfully accused musician, I found myself feeling very empathetic towards him.  It's heartbreaking to watch the delays that occur during his execution - if only those prison guards had answered the phone sooner instead of talking!  Equally fascinating is how after they brought him back, he wasn't just magically okay.  We see the long process of recovery and rejoice when he finds a piano and can remember how to play.   

Though the movie doesn't dig too deeply into the subconscious, or stay too long on deeper topics, there are a few mentioned that deserve to be reviewed.  My primary example is Dr. Evan's growing fascination with what Ellman witnessed during the time when he was dead.  He keeps after him, even as Ellman lies dying in the caretaker's cottage of the cemetery.  Ultimately he is left without more of an answer than just the words "after the shock, I felt peace."  I also appreciated the fact that Nancy was an equal in standing with Jimmy as a worker in Beaumont's lab - not a secretary or a nurse, but a scientist.  Nancy is my favorite character in this film because she's also the one who pushes Jimmy into finally stepping forward and afterward nurses Ellman back to health and refuses to slack on her obligation to him.  I should also add (while I'm thinking of it) that the title is a nice play on the "Dead Man Walking" term used in prisons for men on death row.  Ellman is literally a dead man walking who then becomes the walking dead.  Or can he really be called the walking dead? 

One of the questions that I kept asking myself was whether or not Ellman could be considered a zombie.  After he is brought back to life, he gains control over his mental capacity and doesn't go around eating people (although that part of the zombie culture wouldn't arrive until much later).  Basically, he is in control of himself and not subject to the wills of other forces, so how can he be a zombie?  Well, it is said several times that he seems possessed by a supernatural force, and has become an instrument of some otherworldly power.  How he can now sense those responsible for his death is beyond comprehension, unless he learned it while he was dead.  In fact, Boris Karloff's facial expressions are outstanding in this regard - he can switch from calm and complacent to manically furious in moments.  In the scenes where he confronts the men who framed him, he seems like he really is possessed, and as each man meets his death, we see a close up of Boris Karloff looking like he's coming out of a trance and looking in horror at what's happened.  Perhaps that is why he then goes to the cemetery, a place where he feels he belongs.  While Ellman may not be a traditional zombie, one thing is for certain.  He does embody the fear of our own death, which is at the heart of many zombie films**.  But with his return to life, he also holds that fear at bay until people like Beaumont insist on getting answers and insight into that one thing for which we have no hard evidence - what happens after we die?  Truly, we each have our faiths and beliefs, but could we really resist asking someone who has been there and returned?  It's an interesting situation and one I was not expecting from a horror film.

Review and Recommendation
I highly recommend The Walking Dead not just to zombie-enthusiasts, but to everyone.  Great acting by Karloff and some great camerawork (love the work with those shadows!) make for a good movie, and the added moral questions makes it even more enjoyable.  Definitely not a film to pass over!

**I just finished the second volume of The Walking Dead comic book series by Rick Grimes, and in the back there is an epilogue by Simon Pegg.  Pegg writes that zombies embody our fears of death and our fears that we are little more than animals running on sheer impulse.  It's a great write-up and also a great series - you should check them out!

Monday, October 25, 2010

Dawn of the Dead (1978)

Guns, ammo, Jack Daniel's - gives a whole new meaning to one stop shopping.

Intro.
As you could probably tell from my last post, I had a pretty interesting Saturday night.  No, I was not bitten by any zombies (luckily), but I did get to watch Dawn of the Dead for the first time.  And I was surrounded by zombies (and a few zombie hunters).  It made such a difference watching the movie - there were cheers for both the zombies and the survivors.  The right audience can really make or break your initial impression of a film, and I'm very appreciative to all those who made it such a great experience.

Overview
Dawn of the Dead opens with a television station urgently trying to stay afloat during a crisis.  The dead have been walking around devouring people and the disease - and fear - is spreading quickly.  Two of the station's workers, the traffic reporter/helicopter pilot Stephen (David Emge) and his girlfriend/TV executive, Francine (Gaylen Ross) decide to make a break for Canada in the chopper.  They are met by two SWAT team members, who have just witnessed a brutal police bust on an apartment filled with both the living and the undead.  One of the SWAT guys, Roger (Scott H. Reiniger) knows Stephen and had planned to meet him there.  He brings along his friend Peter (Ken Foree), despite Stephen's remark about the extra weight using more fuel.  They fly out and pass fields of both zombies and hunters, and finally decide to take refuge at a shopping mall (with a convenient helicopter pad on the roof).  Turns out there is a locked room accessible by skylight and stacked full of survival supplies.  The crew decide to stay there for awhile, since when they tried to stop for gas, all the pumps were empty and they were attacked by some hungry zombies.  Anyway, what better place to hold up in than a shopping mall?  Everything they need is just outside of the secure passageway.  It's too tempting for Peter, so he and Roger decide to go out and investigate.  Together they dodge some zombies, kill a few more, and then lock themselves safely inside "Penney's" Department store.  Stephen, not wanting to miss anything, follows them and has to be rescued (in a pretty well-thought-out way!) and when they finally think of going back for Franny, they find her about to be chewed on by a zombie because Stephen forgot to leave her a gun.  Anyway, Franny steps up and gets an equal role with the guys (and she's three months pregnant!), learning to shoot and to fly the helicopter.  The guys figure out how to use the duct system to navigate the mall and pretty soon they build themselves a very comfortable home in the safety area.  But nothing good ever lasts, as first Peter is bitten and turns, then a motorcycle gang of hunters/looters comes to raid the mall.  It's all fine until Stephen lashes out and starts an all out war - man vs. man vs. zombies.  It's pretty intense, all the way to the edge of your seat finale. 

Highlights
I've already mentioned how great this film was with such an enthusiastic audience, but I have to say it again.  Like most horror films, they're not always mainstream, but their fans are dedicated.  The popularity has grown and even exploded in more recent years, with college classes in zombie culture now being taught in several schools.  So much of that is owed to George Romero, for his classics such as Dawn of the Dead.  Unlike the original Night of the Living Dead, Dawn of the Dead is much more comical, definitely touching on the idea of humor as a coping mechanism.

Prior to seeing the film, I asked Catherine to explain it to me.  She said that where Night of the Living Dead was a commentary on racism (as the remake was on feminism), Dawn of the Dead is a commentary on consumerism.  It's blatantly obvious once they land on the mall's roof and witness all the zombies flocking to the building.  "This was an important place in their lives."  What I liked most of all was how the camera shots set up the zombies and the mannequins in the mall - they were posed and acting the same way, as if shoppers had finally "shopped 'til they dropped" and then rose again to become zombies.  Have you ever felt that way after a long day at work?  Or getting up on Monday before you have any coffee?  Just this morning my co-worker said she felt like a zombie because she hadn't had an tea yet.  But it's even worse during busy shopping days - think about that sense of sullenness and desire to shop the day after any major holiday.  It's consumerism and a bit tragic to consider.  But the zombies aren't the only ones affected in Dawn of the Dead.  The survivors all give in to the riches of all that the mall has to offer, including mink coats and chocolates and three course meals, carpets and money taken from the in-mall bank.  The list goes on and on.  Stephen has the cynical line to Franny "well, you always wanted to play house."  But consider their options - what else can they do?  They are relatively safe, well stocked, well fed and very low on fuel with no idea of where the next gas station might be.  In some ways it could be seen as a perfect haven, but also a bit of a prison, like house arrest.  When the novelty wears off and Roger turns into a zombie (only to be killed by Peter, as promised), they need something, anything, to happen.  Their consumer driven paradise is slowly suffocating them.

Enter the motorcycle gang.  I wasn't sure what the purpose of these guys were at first (besides having those great 70's mustaches).  But then I realized that they were other survivors and now the real fight was not between man and zombie, but between man and man.  Peter's plan of just letting them take what they wanted and hide until they left was a good one.  Unfortunately, Stephen snapped and started shooting.  I'm not quite sure why he did - did he feel like he needed to protect this "important place" in his life?  Did he feel that Franny was in danger?  Did he just snap after that prolonged period of just waiting?  It doesn't really matter why he did it, but what matters is how quickly the survivors change from being alright with killing zombies to being alright with killing the living.  In the pull of a trigger, any shadow of morality shatters.  It reminds me of a sign I've been seeing a lot lately - "Zombies Were People Too".  It's true.  They were once people just like us.  Just as they did in Night of the Living Dead, zombies embody our own fears.  That line between monster and fellow human is a fine one.  It's crossed after Peter kills Roger - a huge turning point.  Here they've lived with Roger, taken care of him while he was dying, and now they have to kill him.  After that, it's hard not to imagine them justifying the killing of the motorcyclists.  If they can kill one of their own, then they have no problem killing strangers.

Before I wrap this up, I wanted to take a moment to look at the historical time frame.  I had to check, but it was the late sixties - early seventies that saw the beginning of postmodernism in the art world.  There's a general disheartening in the world and a loss of faith in all of the optimism of previous generations.  The Vietnam War ended in 1975, but its aftermath can still be felt today.  Our consumer culture boomed and kept going into the eighties with high supply and demand and a need for everyone to have everything and to have it "right at their fingertips".  It's a dark part of our culture, and one that is a basic instinct - to have more and better things than your neighbor.  You could probably argue that it is basic survival because having more means wealth which means you are a better candidate as a mate which means a better chance for passing on your genes and becoming a biological success.  But I won't get too much into that, since it's late and I might just be guessing.

One last thing to leave you with, though.  As I was writing this post, I had the song "No Man's Land" by Billy Joel stuck in my head.  One line in particular struck me: "Give us this day our daily discount outlet merchandise / Raise up a multiplex and we will make a sacrifice."  The song was released in 1993, but I wonder if Billy Joel had seen Dawn of the Dead and films with similar messages.  Especially since one of the lines includes the phrase "Zombie town".  Even the title itself is a reference to the area between the trenches during World War I - the original "no man's land."  The battle ground seems a fitting reminder of what the survivors in Dawn of the Dead faced - a modern paradise with everything they could ever need, except hope.

Review and Recommendation
Of all the zombie films I've seen, this is one of my favorites.  While not as serious or deep as the original Night of the Living Dead, it is just as well constructed and even more enjoyable.  Also, the zombies are blue.  Instant win, right there.  If you only see one zombie movie in your life, I definitely recommend making it this one.   
 

P.S. Also, I loved the shout-outs to the original Night of the Living Dead.  I'm probably missing some, but a few I spotted were the blown up truck, the close-ups of stuffed animal heads in the gun shop, the town for the television station being Monroeville, and the listing of shelters on the television (which was also pointed out by Catherine).

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Night of the Living Dead (1968)

"We have met the enemy, and he is us." Well, a slightly more sloppy, drooling, cannibalistic version of us, but still us.

Intro.
Part of my new induction to the world of zombie films included watching both the original Night of the Living Dead from 1968 and the remake from 1990.  Even if you haven't seen either film, you probably know the story - a group of strangers in a farmhouse; lots of slow, flesh-eating zombies; some crazy girl named Barbra.  You've probably even heard the line "they're coming to get you, Barbra!"  So my question going into this film was will it live up to its mighty legacy?   

Overview
Night of the Living Dead actually starts in the evening, with Barbra (Judith O'Dea) and her brother Johnny (Russell Streiner) venturing out to a country cemetery to pay respect to their father.  Although Barbra is obviously uncomfortable in the creepy graveyard, Johnny teases her like when she was a kid - "they're coming to get you, Barbra!" he calls out to her.  The only problem is that another "visitor" in the cemetery actually is coming for her and when he attacks her, Johnny steps in only to get gnawed on himself.  Barbra takes off running, but realizes that Johnny had the car keys.  She coasts the car downhill, hits a tree, then runs to the nearest farmhouse.  She isn't alone long, as a pickup truck pulls up and out comes well-dressed Ben (Duane Jones).  He seems to know exactly what to do and sets about barricading the house.  He even covers the homeowner's half-eaten corpse, despite Barbra's obvious state of shock and complete helplessness.  He tells her about how he saw a gas station blow up because of those "things" and he realizes that they are afraid of fire.  A few stray zombies later and they realize that there are people (non-zombie people) hiding in the basement of the house.  There's a young couple, Tom (Keith Wayne) and Judy (Judith Ridley), and a married couple, Harry (Karl Hardman) and Helen (Marilyn Eastman) who have a young daughter who is sick in the basement.  Harry is pretty stubborn about everyone taking refuge in the cellar and waiting until help arrives.  Ben nixes that idea as there is only one way in and out and he doesn't want to get cornered.  Tensions grow, fights break out, but in the end they all have to work together to survive or become lunch meat.  A television broadcast tells them there's an emergency shelter nearby, and they agree to risk taking Ben's truck to the nearby gas pump to fill up the tank and get them all out of there.  But of course, nothing really works out for our survivors and they get picked off one by one until there's just Ben in the house.  And even his life is in jeopardy.

Highlights
Boy, there is so much to discuss!  George Romero redefined the zombie genre with this film.  It's funny, but some dynamics in this film reminded me of some previous films in different genres.  Although that can happen when a genre begins or is redefined - often the shaping influences are from a wide range of sources and media.  What Night of the Living Dead reminded me of were the Westerns of John Ford and the thrillers of Alfred Hitchcock.  I thought a lot about Ford's classic, Stagecoach, which in its own way helped revitalize the Western film genre.  In Stagecoach, the idea is very simple - take a group of strangers with different and sometimes clashing personalities, put them together in a tight situation and then give them some "outsiders" to fight, which ultimately brings them together.  Be it in a way station on the stage route or in the farmhouse, the tensions and arguments for the best course of survival are the same.  I even expected Ben to say "I saw a ranch house burnin' last night" and then he tells Barbra he actually did see a fire!  In Night of the Living Dead, the argument is to either stay in the basement or to make a break for it; in Stagecoach the argument is to push on towards Lordsburg or to return with the cavalry where they may or may not be safe.  In respect to Hitchcock, there is some great camera work and also the feeling of claustrophobia - almost the entire film takes place in one space - the farmhouse.  Hitchcock often tried to contain his more intense thrillers (like Lifeboat or Rear Window) to one space.  It creates more tension between the characters in close quarters and increases that claustrophobia! *   

I also keep mentioning "others".  In Night of the Living Dead the monsters are never called zombies.  In fact, in most zombie films, the word is never said.  They are the others, the outsiders.  Although in White Zombie the zombies are named - recognized for the people they are.  That's why it's so important that Johnny and later the daughter are recognized among the zombies (sorry for the spoilers, but really? what did you expect - it's a zombie film!!).  It makes it much harder to fight people you know - how can you be expected to shoot your brother or daughter in the head? **  Recognizing the "other" is the key here - they are us.

To make a bit of a detour, I wanted to talk about what was going on when Night of the Living Dead was made.  The cause for the zombie outbreak is attributed to some radiation brought in by a satellite returning from Venus.  It seems a bit silly now, but in 1968, we were 1) in the middle of the Cold War and worried about nuclear warfare 2) we were also in the Space Race and 3) had yet to land on the moon.  Makes it more of a concern, I think.  And it makes the Russians are the "others" of 1968.  It makes it that much more tragic when Ben dies - not at the hands of the zombies, but at the hands of the overzealous survivors who mistake him for a zombie.  Our own fear and paranoia will destroy us. 

Speaking of Ben and his horrible end, Night of the Living Dead was meant as a commentary on racism.  Ben's the lone African-American in the film, the one guy with any class and BAM he gets killed by friendly fire (or should that be not-so-friendly fire?).  This is where the film really diverges from its parallels with Ford's Westerns - there is no happy ending.  Ben doesn't get to go off into the sunset with a girl.  He gets killed anyway, like the whole thing was for naught.  Society (the guys coming in as relief) doesn't recognize his efforts or what he's endured.  But we see it.  Romero makes us see it and makes us painfully aware that Ben is treated as just another dead zombie.  What does that say about audiences in 1968?  What does it say about us now? ***

As much as this film is about racism, it fails to also address sexism (a major criticism).  Barbra, although in shock, just shuts down once a man arrives to take care of her.  My friends and I yelled at her the entire film because of her inability to do or say anything.  Although it is a good step above White Zombie, it still makes you very angry at Barbra.  Luckily we have more sensible women like Judy and especially Helen to balance it out some.  My friend Rachel brought up a good point - Barbra seems to be more afraid of Ben because she's alone in a house with him (and he's an African-American) than she is of the zombies.  If nothing else, she definitely takes on the "deer in headlights" attitude.  Which is fitting because in this farmhouse there are several animal heads mounted on the wall and Barbra is often shot being close to or right in front of the deer's head.  In some way, this could explain her docile nature.  She can't run, so she freezes up and won't move.  That explains why she's also taken by the zombies - she's easy prey.

The Remake - The Night of the Living Dead (1990)
Since the remake of Night of the Living Dead isn't a classic time-wise, I won't give it a separate write-up.  The basic plot and story line remain, but there are some major changes.  Thankfully the biggest one is Barbra (played by Patricia Tallman).  She kicks ass in the remake!  The new Barbra is a determined woman, one who won't passively cower on a couch when there are zombies to kill and people to save.  Instead of Romero commenting on racism, this version he focuses on sexism.  The ending is also very different, as Barbra actually makes it out of the house, down the road and stumbles onto the search and rescue crew.  A key scene there is when she sees a fenced in ring and spectators watching a "zombie fight."  It's a way to distance yourself from zombies being real people - in the remake Tom is related to the farmhouse owner and recongizes many of the zombies as friends and neighbors.  It's a chilling thought about how far you would have to go to survive.  To survive as an individual then, must you turn your back on your family?  Does that have anything to do with the re-establishment of Barbra as a woman of her own independence?  Think about the films of the eighties that dealt with the breaking up of families as a result of women going back to work (Die Hard) comes to mind.  I'm not sure if these ideas are related, as it is getting pretty late and I'm feeling a bit sleepy.  So let me end with this - are zombie movies really about monsters after all?  Or about facing what scares us most about our own selves?    

Review and Recommendation
I recommend both versions of the Night of the Living Dead.  Each one has very good merits and serve as great reflections and commentaries on society.  I have a new-found respect for the zombie genre and look forward to watching more films! 

P.S. I know I've probably left a lot out of this post, which is why you should check out Catherine's zombie blog, here.  If you think of any points you want to bring up, feel free to post comments!!

P.P.S. I was just looking for other sites to reference you for further reading and check this out - it's an article about how Romero was influence by Ford and Hitchcock.  I wasn't making it up - who knew?!  I'm still reading through it, but I couldn't resist linking it!

* I should mention that Romero also used the classic vampire film I Am Legend as inspiration, and possibly the film Things to Come.  

** I also watched the modern zombie film Zombieland right after seeing this film and I loved it!  It mixes both the traditional zombie films with a great sense of humor.  It's a very dark, survival type of humor, often like that seen in war films.  The movie also makes the point never to learn anyone's real name, as you never know when you might need to kill them.  Distance from the other is again in play.  Also, check out the opening shot of Zombieland and the opening shot of Night of the Living Dead (1968).  See anything identical?  I'll give you a hint - it's a pretty big hint that this film is about to comment on American culture.

*** Last note, I swear.  I just realized that 1968 brought America into Vietnam as well.  That's a whole other blog post about racism and fighting "the others".  Something to think about!

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

White Zombie (1932)

Mina! I mean, Madeline!!! ~ Catherine

Intro.
It's great to have friends that are so into movies. Recently I've been watching some zombie films with my zombie-phile friend Catherine. Considered the first Hollywood zombie film, 1932's White Zombie proved to be a good starting point in studying the movie monster phenomenon. I mean, you can't really get much scarier than a scratchy black and white film with close ups of Bela Lugosi!

Overview
White Zombie is the traditional voodoo zombie film - zombies are people given a drug so that they appear to be dead, then their bodies are taken by whomever is working the voodoo and become zombie slaves, without a mind or will of their own. Such is the kind of atmosphere that engaged couple Madeline (Madge Bellamy) and Neil (John Harron) enter as they travel to the house of their friend, Charles Beaumont (Robert Frazer). He has agreed to let them get married at his estate, but really he has other plans. He enlists a local mystery man known to have an army of voodoo slaves working in his factory, 'Murder' Legendre (Bela Lugosi). Legendre's plan is to turn Madeline into a zombie and have her "buried" above ground. It all goes to plan - Neil is convinced she died and Legendre successfully steals her body and turns her into a zombie-slave. But it doesn't end there, as Neil learns what really happened (thanks in part to a local missionary priest, Dr. Bruner (Joseph Cawthorn)) and goes after Madeline. Meanwhile Beaumont discovers that he really didn't want Madeline if she would never smile again. So we have Beaumont and Neil come against Legendre, who's just a bit too voodoo happy for his own good. A few crazy zombie fights in Legendre's super creepy ocean cliff-side castle and at last Madeline recovers in the arms of her love.

Highlights
I think White Zombie was a very important film in the history of horror films and of course in the zombie sub-genre. The low-budget seems obvious and time has not been very kind to the recordings, but even so there's something inherently eerie in scratchy sounds and not-quite-clear pictures. It's definitely Bela Lugosi's vehicle though, not Harron or Bellamy's, though both are key players. He's the one that we watch most intensely and the one who scares us the most. I mean, no other actor besides Vincent Price has ever been so good at being so scary! Catherine told me that he also did not speak English and had to learn his lines phonetically as someone read them to him. That may be the reason his delivery seems out of the normal speaking pattern, but really I just thought the unusual breaks and lilts were to effectively make him more mysterious. He had made Dracula only a year early, and was billed in White Zombie as "Bela Dracula Lugosi". It's pretty easy to see that the filmmakers drew more than just his name to make this film - the entire opening and Legendre's castle all seem like a repeat of Dracula. At one point Legendre's interaction with Madeline is very close to Dracula's talk with Mina (which prompted the quote in my tagline)!

There is quite a lot to be said about the film culturally, but I won't get to all of it here. I'm sure Catherine will cover it on her blog (which you should check out!). I won't even get into the racism issues, though I have to admit, at first I thought that the "white" in White Zombie referred to Madeline being a bride - she's definitely the woman in white here. It's also a sign of her innocence and sacrifice. More than racism, it also had some inherent sexism. I mean, really? You want this woman to leave her fiancee and love you so naturally the best way to do that is to fake her death and turn her into a mindless slave? There is some hope though, as Beaumont realizes that he was very wrong to do this to Madeline - that beauty alone wasn't enough, he needed her to have her soul back. I should correct my post, as these zombies weren't really mindless so much as they were soulless and without willpower. We can see this not only with Madeline, but also with Legendre's other zombies - big scary men who carry out his will. To quote Catherine again, they were puppets, acting out the fears of the audience - loss of control, loss of free will. I think the line that struck me the most in the film was from Bela Lugosi. He's telling Beaumont about his "factory workers" who of course are all zombies under his spell. Legendre says "they are quite used to long hours" as if to suggest that the perfect workers have no sense of time or think to complain. I wonder what factory workers of the time felt - first Charlie Chaplin's Modern Times and now this. Dark thoughts for such a dark time as the Great Depression.

Review and Recommendation
Well, it's getting late and I'm about zombied-out. White Zombie was a pretty interesting look at old Hollywood history. From a genre standpoint, it's an important film to watch. If you can forgive the low-budget and poor quality, you'll probably enjoy it. If nothing else, it's just fun to watch Bela Lugosi make so many creepy faces!

Saturday, October 9, 2010

October Fun!

My friend Catherine is a big fan of zombie movies.  Really, she's an expert on all things zombie - books, films, general knowledge of how to best barricade her house in case of a zombie virus outbreak.  Anyway, as we are now in October, it's time for all those great classic monster films and we've agreed to watch several old zombie movies together.  I'll post about them here from a general classic-film standpoint and Catherine will be posting about them on her blog.  So keep checking in for the latest and greatest in the undead on film!

Here's her blog, Zombi Ga Imasu !  Enjoy!!